Text Ning Fan
PhD candidates explain their most thought-provoking proposition. This time, it’s Jorge Armero Gimenez. He received his PhD on 21 February for research on utilizing a novel production system to develop a vaccine-based pandemic preparedness platform.
‘During my PhD in molecular science, I noticed that more and more companies are integrating AI into their work, for example to design proteins and antibodies, improve DNA sequences and optimize production systems. ‘It reminded me of the early days of PCR (a method for amplifying a piece of DNA, ed.). Back then, researchers had to manually move tubes between water baths. The invention of the PCR machine freed up researchers and allowing them to focus on other tasks. I believe AI is having a similar impact today. Those who use it are moving faster, while those who don’t risk falling behind.
‘Research is a highly competitive field. AI is no longer just a helpful addition but a necessity. I’ve seen colleagues start with a rough idea for a proposal and use generative AI to refine and edit it. This saves time and increases their chances of getting funding.
‘Will AI replace humans in research? I don’t think so. It’s a powerful tool, but it can’t replace human creativity. Some of the most important discoveries come from accidents or unconventional ideas. AI can boost research, but it’s still people who bring the spark that leads to real breakthroughs.’
